top of page

St. Charles Dam Decision Delayed; City to Hire Experts for Independent Studies

Introduction

The Fox River Dam Joint Task Force met on August 5, 2024, to address new developments in the ongoing debate over the future of the St. Charles dam. The meeting focused on the Army Corps of Engineers’ (USACE) communication, delays caused by federal environmental regulations, and the city’s plan to commission independent studies before making any recommendations to the City Council.


USACE Delays and NEPA Regulation Changes

The Army Corps of Engineers announced a delay in their original May 2025 dam removal timeline, citing the need for an additional programmatic environmental assessment. New National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) regulations have further complicated timelines and created uncertainty about the depth of future studies.

Concerns were raised that the USACE assessment may avoid conducting detailed hydrology and sediment studies and could lead to a “no significant impact” finding without comprehensive review.


Task Force Commitment to Independent Research

In response, the Task Force committed to conducting its own studies to ensure thorough evaluation. The city will develop a Scope of Services (SOS) for a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) or Request for Proposal (RFP) to hire expert consultants, including hydrologists and stormwater engineers.


Subcommittee Reports Highlight Key Study Areas

Environmental Subcommittee Priorities

  • Hydrological modeling for river levels with and without the dam

  • Comprehensive sediment quality and water quality studies

  • Fish assemblage and algae density surveys

Recreational Subcommittee Priorities

  • High-quality interactive maps of water depth, width, and speed

  • Mapping of property ownership and accessibility along the river

  • Broader geographical scope from Geneva to South Elgin

Economic Impact Subcommittee Priorities

  • Analysis of current and potential recreational activities

  • Economic projections with and without the dam

  • Detailed maintenance cost analysis for the dam


Public Concerns and Community Engagement

Public commenters raised skepticism about USACE data reliability, noting that studies may be outdated or biased. Others stressed the economic value of the dam as a downtown attraction, while historic preservation advocates emphasized the Section 106 process, which assesses impacts on landmarks like the Municipal Building and Hotel Baker.

Residents also raised questions about:

  • Funding for the upcoming studies

  • Consideration of dam modification as an alternative to full removal

  • Legal protections for water levels


Decisions and Next Steps

  • The Task Force approved the June 6, 2024 minutes.

  • A Scope of Services will be developed to hire specialized consultants.

  • The next meeting will be scheduled only after the scope is finalized.

Consultant selection and initial reports are expected within six months, ensuring that no final decisions are made until thorough, independent data is available.


Key Takeaways from the Meeting

  • USACE delays provide time for deeper analysis.

  • Independent studies are central to future decisions.

  • Public engagement remains strong, with a focus on transparency and accountability.

  • Historic preservation and economic considerations will play major roles.


Final Thoughts

The August 5, 2024, meeting demonstrated the Task Force’s commitment to a fact-based approach in evaluating the Fox River Dam’s future. With federal timelines uncertain and residents voicing strong concerns, the city is taking a cautious approach by commissioning independent environmental, recreational, and economic studies.


This decision reflects St. Charles’ dedication to transparency, community input, and long-term planning before determining whether to remove or retain this landmark structure.

Comments


bottom of page