St. Charles Reviews Development, River, and Retail Plans
- Omer Farooq
- Sep 8
- 3 min read
The St. Charles Planning & Development Committee met on September 18, 2023, to address several key city development projects, subdivision challenges, downtown property planning, and community concerns about the Fox River. Topics included Reserve St. Charles Subdivision Phase Two, the proposed Sports Crossing retail development, a gas station PUD amendment, and special use requests for Chick-fil-A and city walkway agreements.
Reserve St. Charles Subdivision Phase Two
Discussion Overview
The committee opened with a high-priority discussion regarding street improvements in Phase Two of the Reserve St. Charles Subdivision. The project faced a $42,569 shortfall beyond the developer’s financial guarantee of $343,249, primarily due to replacing aging 15-year-old pavement.
The developer, Omnitech LLC, was willing to complete the streets but refused to cover the additional cost.
Options included compelling the developer to complete the work (potentially delaying completion) or having the city cover the shortfall.
Decision
Motion to approve drawing on the letter of credit to fund the shortfall was denied (5-4 vote).
The issue will be revisited, with staff exploring alternative bids or scope modifications to complete street improvements without setting a precedent for future projects.
Sports Crossing Retail Development
Project Overview
Presented by Greco Investment Management, the Sports Crossing project envisions a retail and restaurant piazza with a family office relocation.
The project includes purchasing the adjacent Jewel property to address parking needs.
Committee Response
Members expressed strong support, noting the potential to revitalize the east side of St. Charles and create a destination area consistent with the city’s comprehensive plan.
1025 Main Street Gas Station PUD Amendment
Discussion
The applicant sought to remove a parking space to accommodate a newly required electric transformer.
Concerns were raised about site limitations, proximity to neighbors, and historical disputes over dumpster placement.
Decision
Motion to approve the minor PUD amendment was denied, encouraging the applicant to redraw plans for improved spacing and minimized neighborhood impact.
Other Development Approvals
2910 Greenbrier Drive Easement Vacation: Approved for relocating a storm sewer to accommodate a home addition.
Chick-fil-A Drive-Through at 3795 Main Street: Approved as part of a redevelopment of a vacant building.
309 Walnut Street Walkway License Agreement: Approved to formalize a concrete walkway on city property.
Downtown Property Feasibility Study RFP: Approved to explore options for the former police department site, with phased public engagement after technical studies.
Fox River Dam Discussion
Public comments raised concerns about a preliminary Army Corps of Engineers study suggesting the removal of Fox River dams.
Residents feared impacts on river levels, recreation, tourism, property values, and local wildlife.
City officials clarified that the St. Charles dam is state-owned, and no removal would occur without city consent.
The city plans to formalize a stance on water levels and ensure public engagement before any actions are taken.
Key Takeaways
Reserve St. Charles Subdivision street improvements remain unresolved; city exploring alternatives.
Sports Crossing retail project gains committee support, promising downtown revitalization.
Gas station PUD amendment denied; applicant encouraged to revise plans for neighbor impact.
Other approvals include Chick-fil-A, Greenbrier easement, Walnut Street walkway, and downtown feasibility study.
Community engagement on Fox River dams highlighted public concern over river levels and recreational impacts.
Final Thoughts
The September 18 meeting demonstrates St. Charles’ commitment to responsible development, balancing the interests of developers, residents, and local businesses. With major retail projects moving forward, unresolved subdivision issues, and proactive planning for the Fox River, the committee continues to navigate complex decisions affecting both downtown growth and community preservation.
Comments